Why Competing on Price Is Dangerous 3 comments
A business owner friend, Carrie (name changed to protect the innocent), asked me about a new business venture she was considering pursuing. She asked me for advice on whether I thought the idea was a good idea.
She was considering creating a business that would seek to be the middle man between customers and a certain type of building contractor. I recommended against it.
Carrie asked: “I want to ask you a clarifying question. You said it wasn’t a good idea for me to pursue. First, I want to thank you for not only saying your true opinion but also giving some meat to it. Is it that you don’t think the business idea itself is bad or that you don’t think it aligns with me?”
Here’s the answer I emailed her:
————–
Hi Carrie,
It’s not that I dislike your idea. It’s that I don’t like the category it fits into.
There are only two categories of businesses that succeed: “commodity” businesses and “premier” businesses. The main difference between the two: a commodity business’ success is determined by the market while a premier business’ success is determined by the business owner. (An aside; businesses that try to find a midpoint between the two are doomed to fail, the reasons for which I can explain in detail some other time if you like.)
Commodity businesses’ main carrot for customers is low price. Because their margins are low, they can’t afford to differentiate themselves from that competition. This makes commodity businesses easier to copy. This increases the need to spend large portions of the budget seeking market share dominance through quick expansion, which further increases the need to lower prices, which further lowers margins, which further makes it difficult to differentiate, which puts most of the variables of your success OUT of your control. The economy, the behavior of the competition, regulatory issues, low-cost labor availability and tax laws end up having more effect on your chances of success than the way you design your business.
Premier businesses are the opposite. They compete on value and differentiation. They actually benefit more by raising their prices (and the corresponding implication to the customer that their value is high) than by lowering them. They seek to dominate the competition by creating a product/service that is so valuable and so different that it is nearly impossible for the competition to duplicate; they seek to monopolize their market. THEY control their own success through their own creativity and innovation, as you are doing with your business.
Here’s a list of examples of different types of replicated businesses that have multiple locations:
Commodity Businesses vs. Premier Businesses
McDonald’s vs. The Restaurants of Jean-Georges Vongerichten
Sears vs. Barney’s
A Municipal Golf Course vs. Golf Courses Designed by Robert Trent Jones
Supercuts vs. Kim Vo Salons
Super 8 Motel vs. Fairmont Hotels
The difference between the two categories?
All of the businesses on the left have experienced near-bankruptcy and plummeting stock values, whereas the businesses on the right have all experienced enormous profit margins, growing loyal customer bases, and steady, expanding growth.
I like your idea, but, ultimately, I don’t think you are going to be able to control whether it succeeds or not; the market will.
Hope that helps (and wasn’t too preachy).
Ted
3 Responses to 'Why Competing on Price Is Dangerous'
Subscribe to comments with RSS
-
A premier business is a business that competes on differentiated value. They compete on how they benefit the customer in ways that other businesses can and do not. So, my guess about why Saks is not succeeding is that they don’t offer significant enough unique value. Clothing lines that make people feel the way they want to feel that nobody else sells. Or customer service that makes customers feel the way they want to feel that nobody else offers. It could also be that they have unique value, but nobody knows about it; they aren’t getting the message to the customers who are going to resonate with it.
-
Hi Ted,
We feel part of the world today thanks to your generous help. You not only made us proud of what we are trying to achieve but also of who we are. All who have visited our site talk of how professional it looks.
Warm regards,
Willie
I agree with you for the most part…. but in light of the last 3 months, it seems the commodity businesses are holding their own somewhat, where as many of the premier entites have fallen on rough times. Ie, McDonalds vs the higher end steak chains, or Walmart vs Saks etc.
Granted, I’m equating a premier business to one which sells higher priced goods and services, and that may not necessarily always be a valid assumption. Ie, someone might be a premier business selling lower cost items, but at a premium value and price point compared to the commodity world.
What are your thoughts on this… the economy up ending is changing a lot of business models. Commodity is not where its at, unless one is Walmart of McDonalds, but how does a premier entity survive.